|
[03/09] Samsung, Panasonic start selling 3-D TVs [03/09] Britain's trade deficit widens [03/09] China passenger car sales up 55 percent in Feb [03/09] Ford launches affordable made-for-India compact [03/09] EADS makes loss but says visibility improving
More...
Articles
Sexual Orientation Discrimination and Employment
Currently, the legal protections against discrimination in the workplace based on sexual orientation are few. Many of the federal antidiscrimination laws that protect individuals from discrimination based on sex, race, national origin and religion have not been extended to sexual orientation. However, the 2003 US Supreme Court decision in Lawrence v. Texas may have opened the door for increased protections against sexual orientation discrimination in the public sphere, including at work.
More...
Calculating Overtime Compensation
Employers are required to pay overtime compensation to any qualified, nonexempt employees who work more than 40 hours in a workweek at a rate not less than one and a half times their regular rate of pay per hour of overtime.
More...
What is a Reasonable Accommodation under the ADA?
Under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), employers are prohibited from discriminating against qualified disabled workers in employment decisions, including hiring, firing, raises and promotions. In order for the protections of the Act to apply to a disabled worker, the worker must be qualified for the position. This means that the worker must be able to perform the basic functions of the job with or without reasonable accommodations.
More...
How Should Employers Conduct Performance Evaluations?
Conducting employee performance evaluations serves many important purposes for employers. It allows employers to monitor employee job performance, evaluate company goals and progress towards meeting those goals and determine any areas of weakness that need to be addressed.
More...
|
|
Case Summaries
[03/09] Equal Employment Opportunity Comm'n v. Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church & Sch. In an employment discrimination and retaliation action brought by a teacher at a religious school claiming violations of the ADA, the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendant based on the "ministerial exception" is vacated and remanded as, given the factual findings relating to plaintiff's primary duties as a teacher, the district court erred in its legal conclusion classifying her as a ministerial employee.
[03/08] McBeth v. Himes In a 42 U.S.C. section 1983 action arising out of an investigation by the sheriff's office and the Colorado Department of Human Services that resulted in plaintiff surrendering her license to run a daycare facility in Colorado, partial summary judgment based on qualified immunity to defendant-officials is affirmed in part where: 1) plaintiff voluntarily relinquished her license before any suspension proceedings could take place; and 2) defendants made a prima facie showing that they acted objectively reasonably when they sought suspension of plaintiff's daycare license. However, the order is reversed in part where plaintiff failed to allege and prove that the state officials lacked cause to seek suspension of her license.
[03/05] Rhine v. Stevedoring Servs. of Am. In a petition for review of a decision of the Benefits Review Board under 33 U.S.C. section 921(c) of the Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act, the petition is denied where: 1) a reasonable mind could have concluded that the Pacific Maritime Association Average adequately represented petitioner's annual earning capacity; and 2) the availability of alternative employment was determined by reference to two criteria: the claimant's physical abilities and the economic availability of particular jobs in the market.
[03/05] Quasius v. Schwan Food Co. In an employment discrimination action, summary judgment for defendant is affirmed where defendant failed to file a motion to withdraw his dispositive admissions after the district court provided ample notice and opportunity to do so.
[03/04] Smith v. Adventist Health Sys. In plaintiff's action against defendant-hospital group seeking a preliminary injunction for rejecting his application for hospital privileges and medical staff membership at defendant's hospital, judgment granting the injunction and restoring his privileges is affirmed and the court did not err when it: 1) impliedly found that a statutorily required injunction bond had been waived or forfeited; 2) expressly found that plaintiff was likely to prevail on the merits; and 3) balanced the likely interim harm to the parties of granting or denying the preliminary injunction.
More...
|