News

[05/09] Texas may claim Amazon owes sales taxes
[05/09] Circuit City allows Blockbuster, Icahn to review books
[05/09] Icahn prepared to buy Circuit City if Blockbuster can't
[05/09] Cosmetics firm Lancome and Uma Thurman in contract dispute
[05/08] New rule would limit insurers contact with elderly, disabled

More...

Articles

Asserting Your Rights in the Workplace

Depending on the size of your employer, the state in which you live, and your profession, you may be entitled to certain legal protections in the workplace, including:

More...

Testing Job Applicants

Many employers like to use pre-employment tests as a way to screen out applicants who are not suitable for the job. These tests include skills tests, aptitude tests, psychological tests, personality tests, honesty tests, medical tests, and drug tests.

More...

What laws protect disabled workers from workplace discrimination?

The Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) prohibits employment discrimination on the basis of workers' disabilities. Generally, the ADA prohibits employers from:

More...

Are there laws that prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation??

Fifteen states prohibit private employers from making employment decisions based on sexual orientation, as do many county and municipal governments. However, no federal law prohibits sexual orientation discrimination in private employment.

More...

Case Summaries

[05/09] Fashion Valley Mall, LLC v. National Labor Relations Board
Mall's petition for review of a National Labor Relations Board order, which held that it was a violation of a party's free speech rights under the California Constitution to require a permit applicant to agree not to urge consumers to boycott any of the mall's tenants as a condition to obtaining a permit to engage in expressive activities at the mall, is denied where petitioner failed to raise its constitutional arguments before the circuit court in prior proceedings, and waited until it petitioned the California Supreme Court for a rehearing.

[05/09] McCann v. Tillman
In a Title VII suit against an employer alleging claims of racial discrimination, retaliation, and hostile work environment, summary judgment for employer is affirmed where: 1) the record demonstrated that employee's claims of favorable disparate treatment of similarly situated white employees were inapposite to establish a prima facie case of discrimination; 2) employee failed to meet the burden of showing that the reasons for her employer's actions were actually a pretext for retaliatory conduct; and 3) despite employee's allegations of exposure to offensive derogatory language at work, the evidence presented was insufficient to support a claim of hostile work environment.

[05/08] U.S. v. Harper
In an action alleging intentional and negligent misrepresentation by defendant's failure to disclose information in a referral letter, judgment against one defendant is reversed where: 1) the referral letter was not affirmatively misleading since it did not comment nor recommend on the doctor's proficiency; and 2) defendant did not have an affirmative duty to disclose negative facts. As for other defendants, their liability is affirmed, but the case is vacated and remanded in order to determine if there needs to be a re-apportionment of damages between the remaining defendants.

[05/08] Air Line Pilots Ass'n v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
In proceedings arising after the NLRB brought a complaint alleging that, by attempting to enforce certain provisions of a collective bargaining agreement with DHL Airways, petitioner-pilots' association had committed unfair labor practices, the association's petition for review of a finding that its conduct violated the National Labor Relations Act is granted where, under the analysis of Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Jacksonville Terminal Co., 394 U.S. 369, the NLRB did not have jurisdiction over this Railway Labor Act dispute.

[04/29] Ramirez v. Murdick
In an action wherein plaintiff filed a Huffman claim seeking liquidated damages, attorney's fees and costs for the late payment of worker's compensation benefits, summary judgment for defendants is affirmed where: 1) the Superior Court did not err in its interpretation and application of Workers' Compensation Act, 19 Del. C. sections 2357 and 2362(c); and 2) although the Superior Court erred in converting employer's motion to dismiss into a motion for summary judgment without notice, the error was harmless.

More...

Frequently Asked Questions

Are there certain questions that an employer may not ask during a job interview?

When may an employee be entitled to medical leave from work?

How can an employee secure a reasonable accommodation for his or her disability by an employer?

How may an employer monitor employees in the workplace?

When is harassment illegal?

More...

How must an employer respond to a request for accommodation?

What must an employer do if it suspects that an employee performance problem is caused by a medical condition?

Must an employer provide employment references?

What must an employer do if it receives a complaint of harassment?

What should an anti-harassment policy contain?

More...


Visit Our Other Sites:Sexual HarassmentWrongful TerminationPregnancy Discrimination
Successful Results
  • Attorneys at the Bononi Law Group have achieved notable successes in a variety of matters including:
  • Jury verdict and attorneys’ fees award for the plaintiff against a public entity in a disability discrimination lawsuit in Los Angeles County Superior Court in excess of $400,000.
  • Seven-figure jury verdict on behalf of the plaintiff in a partnership/employment dispute involving a company that specialized in property and business tax assessments.
  • Settlement of an age and sexual orientation discrimination case against a major government contractor for in excess of $500,000.
  • Settlement of multiple sexual harassment cases for amounts in excess of $400,000.
  • A settlement of over $6 million obtained in mediation on behalf of an entertainment company which had asserted claims concerning the right to broadcast NASCAR races against a major network.
  • $3 million dollar jury verdict for an "up-scale" jewelry store in a bad-faith insurance case tried in Orange County Superior Court.
  • Defense verdict for a Fortune 50 company after a jury trial in Los Angeles County Superior Court in a disability discrimination case.
  • Defense verdict on behalf of lighting company after a jury trial in Los Angeles County Superior Court in an age discrimination case brought by the Company’s Vice President and Controller.

Learn More >>


FirmSite® by FindLaw, a Thomson Reuters business.

We serve clients in Los Angeles, California, and in communities throughout Orange County, Riverside County, San Bernardino County, San Diego County, Ventura County, Santa Barbara County, Kern County, and Fresno County, such as Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Diego, Ventura, Santa Barbara, and Fresno.